Chapter 6
Types of Landslides Identified in the Study Area

Landslides identified in the study area were grouped into two classes, shallow-seated and deep-seated.  Then the two classes of slides were further divided into three categories related to their state of stability: active, inactive-young, and inactive-mature.  For the purpose of this study, the division between deep- and shallow-seated landslides is defined as slides with a failure plane greater or less than 4.5 meters below the ground surface.  This depth separation is based on a frequency versus exposed scarp histogram, the thickness of residual soils on the slopes, bore hole logs, and field observations (Figure 16, Table 1 and appendix 1).  According to most, if not all of the geotechnical community landslides are divided into two classes related to the depth to the failure plane typically called a toe circle (shallow) failure and a base circle (deep) failure (Al-Khafaji and Andersland, 1992).  These geotechnical definitions were not used in this study, because most, if not all of the failures were “toe circle” type failures.  There was a distinction found between this type of failure (toe circle) related to the depth to the failure plane as previously mentioned and hence the two classes, deep- and shallow-seated landslides, was defined for this study (Figure 16).

 

 

Figure 16: Histogram of Frequency versus exposed scarp for all the landslides in the study area.  Note the dividing depth between shallow-seated and deep-seated at 4.5 meters.

There are currently 79 identified landslides within the study area (Plate 1).  The predominate class of landslides are shallow-seated, totaling 65 slides.  However, there are at least 14 deep-seated landslide complexes which are potentially the most destructive and hardest to mitigate.  All of these landslides were also classified geomorphologically, totaling 65 earthflows, 3 earthflow/debrisflows, 9 slumps, and 2 slump/earthflows (Easterbrook, 1993).  The following is a brief overview of the location of landslides found in the study area.

Landslide scarps in the southern portion of the study area, especially the deep-seated landslides, are located along the contact between the Troutdale/Sandy River Mudstone Formation and the Boring Lavas (Plate 1).  In this portion, most of the shallow-seated landslides occur along the locally steeper slopes of creek banks, in man-made fills, and on inactive-young and inactive-mature landslides scarps and toes.

In the northern portion of the study area, the deep-seated landslides are generally located along the perimeter of the canyon where the slopes change from relatively flat to steep (Plate 1). Most of the active, shallow-seated slides are located in this northern portion.  Similar to the southern portion, the shallow-seated slides in the northern portion are generally associated with locally oversteepened creek banks, man-made fills, and to a lesser extent with inactive-young and mature landslide features.

Deep-Seated Landslides

Most of the deep-seated landslides in the study area are classified as inactive-young and inactive-mature, with the exception of the 1997 failure of the Spady Landslide and the Dewey Street-Warren Street Landslide, which are active (McCalpin, 1974).  The exposed scarps for deep-seated slides range from 5 to 24 meters, with most of the exposed scarps occurring at an average of 12 meters (±6.6 meters) (Figure 16).  The area of these deep-seated slide complexes is generally much larger than that of the shallow-seated slides and range from 1,622 m2 to 256,436 m2 or 0.05% to 7.41% of the study area.  Almost all of these deep-seated landslides have smaller, inactive-young and active, shallow-seated slides within their boundaries.  Out of the two active deep-seated landslides in the study area, one of these landslides had a complete evacuation of material, while the other landslide seemed to have relatively smaller horizontal and vertical movements, probably constrained by the depth to the failure plane.  These relatively smaller horizontal and vertical movements are most likely indicating drained conditions.

Out of the 14 deep seated landslides, the Highway 213-Morton Road landslide and the Highway 213-Mile Post 2.1 landslide were examined in detail.  Both of these landslides seemed to be representative of most of the deep-seated slides in the study area based on size and morphology.

The Highway 213-Morton Road Landslide

The Highway 213-Morton Road deep-seated landslide was mapped by Schlicker and Finlayson in 1979 as a “large area of bedrock (Troutdale Formation) failure characterized by irregular topography, disrupted stratigraphy, overall anomalous moderate to shallow slope, and disrupted drainage pattern” (Figure 17 and Figure 18).  This large inactive-mature slide has an estimated area of 208,925 m2 and contains landslide features characteristic of inactive-mature landslides.  It is approximately 500 meters long and 400 meters wide.  The topography near the head scarp varies from very steep (40°+) to moderately steep (20°).  The topography within the landslide mass is rolling and considerably flatter than that of the head scarp or toe.  Highway 213 cuts across this flatter area (trending north/south) and construction of the highway through this area resulted in a large area of fill (northern extent of slide mass) with a large scale diameter (2.5 meter) culvert diverting Newell Creek under the highway.  At the southern end of Highway 213 (southern extent of slide mass) a high (35 meter) cutslope was constructed.  Most of the area is forested with Douglas fir and deciduous trees with the exception of a couple of small pastures.

Figure 17: Plan view of surficial features identified for The Highway 213-Morton Road Landslide, a deep-seated landslide.

 

 

Figure 18: Cross-section A-A' through the Highway 213-Morton Road, deep-seated Landslide displaying the Bishop stability analysis calculated failure plane for the current conditions and the generalized stratigraphy and approximate material parameters from bore-hole and well logs.

The zone of extension is characterized by a large head scarp approximately 500 meters long, with a maximum 12 meters of vertical displacement showing on the surface.  This head scarp is rounded, non-continuous, and revegetated with a smaller (40 m2) active slide occurring on it on the northern side.  It is dissected by a small creek at the southern end and does not appear to have any tension cracks above the head scarp.  There is one sag pond on top of a down-dropped block located just south of the smaller active slide.  Just south of the sag pond is a flat area (top of a down-dropped block) where several structures and houses are located.

The shear zones appear as small gullies and creeks that are non-continuous, partially due to the construction of the large cutslope at the southern end of the slide.

Below Highway 213 is the toe, which is steep to very steep (70°-80°) in places and which has two smaller active slides and two inactive-young slides located on it (Figure 17).  The three northernmost younger slides are shallow-seated (depth to failure plane<4.5 m).  The southern younger slide is a deep-seated landslide.

Some of the bore-hole and well logs drilled during the construction of Highway 213 in 1979 and later, show gradual increases in sediment grain size with depth, from clays and silts to sands and gravels and other suspicious stratigraphic units.  One well-water drillers log (29), located just above the head scarp near Morton Road, shows a gradual but consistent increase in the grain size with depth from clay rich to a predominately sandy soil at a depth of approximately 50 m (Figure 18 and appendix 1).  Bore-hole log TB-104, located just north of the cross-section, displays the phreatic water surface at approximately two meters below the ground surface (Figure 18 and appendix 1).  Bore-hole log TB-108, located just below the southern head scarp, has an organic layer at a depth of 16.8 m (appendix 1).  This organic layer may represent a paleosol (old land surface) that is now restricting water movement below it causing an increased local water table.

 Table 4: Highway 213-Morton Road Landslide Stability Analysis Results, assuming undrained conditions.

Trial

Effective Cohesion

(Clays & Silts)

kN/m2 (psf)

Effective Angle of Internal Friction

(Clays & Silts)

degrees

Angle of Internal Friction

(Sands & Gravels)

degrees

Earthquake

load

(horizontal

coefficient)

Factor of Safety

1

38.3(800)

15

35

none

2.8

1a

38.3(800)

15

35

major (0.1)

1.5

1b

38.3(800)

15

35

great (0.15)

1.3

2

28.7(600)

0

35

none

1.6

2a

28.7(600)

0

35

major (0.1)

0.8

2b

28.7(600)

0

35

great (0.15)

0.6

3

19.5(400)

0

32

none

1.2

3a

19.5(400)

0

32

major (0.1)

0.6

3b

19.5(400)

0

32

great (0.15)

0.5

 

To locate an approximate failure plane and a factor of safety for this deep-seated landslide, the program XSTABL was used with the Bishop analysis for circular failure planes (Table 4)(Sharma, 1994).  The current conditions used in the initial stability analysis were derived from the surficial landslide features (Figure 17), the generalized subsurface soil properties from bore holes TB-104 and TB-108 and phreatic water surfaces found in well log 29 and bore hole TB-104 (appendix 2, Figure 18).  This analysis consisted of three trials, starting with estimated material properties (cohesion and angle of internal friction) from the subsurface data, then lowering the values until a reasonable factor of safety was found (Table 4, appendix 2).  The material properties displayed in Figure 18 are most likely very close to the residual strength.  The most critical failure plane (Fs=1.2) occurs at a maximum depth of 25 meters, approximately twice the exposed scarp (12 meters), and is depicted on the cross-section (Figure 18).  To confirm this approximate depth to the failure plane, the critical thickness was calculated, resulting with a thickness of 21.5 meters, a value slightly less than that calculated by XSTABL, but within a close range of approximation considering the lack of subsurface information (appendix 2).  Further stability analysis of this landslide included the addition of a horizontal earthquake load through a coefficient (k).  Recommended values from the California Department of Conservation (1997) included k=0.10 for a 6.5 magnitude earthquake (major) and k=0.15 for a 8.25 magnitude earthquake (great).  This analysis resulted in a factor of safety ranging from 1.5 to 0.6 for a major earthquake and 1.3 to 0.5 for a great earthquake (appendix 2).

Although major development, including cutslopes and fills, occurred during the building of Highway 213, which passes across the toe of this landslide, this slide does not appear to have any deep-seated movements since this construction.  But, examination of the toe and the scarp indicate active and inactive-young slides have been modifying this deep-seated landslide continuously.  The stability analysis confirms the current conditions of this deep-seated movement with a factor of safety of 1.2 for the current conditions.  It was also discovered that a even major earthquake (magnitude=6.5) could cause a decrease in the factor of safety below one, indicating reactivation of this landslide (California Department of Conservation, 1997).  These predicted factors of safety show that there is a chance of reactivation for this inactive-mature, deep-seated landslide and others like it.

The Highway 213, Mile Post 2.1 Deep-Seated Landslide

In 1979 the Oregon Department of Transportation began investigation for the construction of Highway 213.  Included in this investigation was a series of bore holes.  Some of these bore holes were very helpful in more accurately assessing the depth to the failure plane of some of the deep-seated landslides.  The Highway 213, mile post 2.1 landslide (Plate 1), located crossing Highway 213 in the central portion of the study area is a deep-seated, inactive-mature landslide very similar to the Highway 213-Morton Road landslide described in the last section.  This slide has a double bowl shape in plan view and is approximately 300 meters wide and 300 meters long with an exposed maximum scarp of approximately nine meters.  The scarp and toe parallel Highway 213, Holly Lane and Newell Creek.  Within this landslide’s boundaries are two smaller, shallow-seated, active slides, both of which appear to have their scarps in the road prism of Highway 213.  During the building of Highway 213, the Oregon Department of Transportation recognized this deep-seated slide through surficial mapping and subsurface exploration and mitigated it with a rock buttress located upslope from the highway (ODOT, 1998).

One of the bore holes, TB-109, drilled during construction of the highway, notes the presence of slickensides at a depth of approximately 13.5 meters (ODOT, 1998) (appendix 1).  The depth of the slickensides in this bore hole (TB-109), located in the middle the Highway 213, mile post 2.1 deep seated landslide, is interpreted to display the approximate depth to the failure plane.  Although this interpreted depth to failure plane (13.5 meters) does not match the estimated depth from the exposed scarp (nine meters), their comparison confirms that this slide is deep-seated.

Deep-Seated Landslide Conclusions

Since most of these deep-seated slides are prehistoric, human caused induction can be ruled out.  The most probable initiating causes of these slides are a wetter prehistoric climate, inundation and quick lake level drop following the 40+ Missoula Floods (12,700 to 15,300 years B.P.), and earthquake shaking (CDC, 1997; Waitt, 1985).  Although most of these slides are considered inactive-mature (dormant), extreme caution should be exercised before any construction takes place on or near one of these deep-seated slides, including a complete surface/subsurface investigation and a slope stability analysis including earthquake loads by an engineering geologist and a geotechnical engineer.  This recommendation is further supported by the fact that the Dewey-Warren Street landslide reactivated in response to above average rainfall in 1996 (Figure 19).  This deep-seated slide, located in the northwest section of the study area, had a horizontal displacement of only 0.3 meters and a vertical displacement of 0.5 meters in 1996 (Figure 19).  This minor amount of movement was enough to damage the foundation of a new house to the point where repair was not economically feasible.

Shallow-Seated Landslides

There are about 65 shallow-seated landslides in the study area.  The scarps range from 0.2 to 4 meters with an average vertical displacement of two meters (± 1.0 meters)(Figure 16).  This average vertical displacement measured on the scarps of two meters was used to approximate the depth to the failure plane which corresponds to the general location of the contact between the residual soils and bedrock (Table 1)(Gerig, 1985).  These shallow-seated slides generally have a much smaller area than the deep-seated slides, ranging from 36 to 6,141 m2 or 0.001% to 0.2% of the study area, in size.  This smaller size is probably due to the constraint of the depth to the failure plane.  Most of the shallow-seated slides resulted in a complete evacuation of the material, sometimes exposing all of the failure surface, unlike the deep-seated landslides.

Figure 19: Reactivation of the Dewey-Warren Street, deep-seated landslide with destroyed (red tagged) house in the background.  An 8 ½ inch by 11 inch size field notebook is on the scarp for scale.  Displacement measured on the scarp only totaled 0.3 meters of horizontal and 0.5 meters of vertical.

Many of these shallow-seated slides are active and hence younger than the deep-seated slides.  Furthermore, many of these younger shallow-seated slides have been active within the last ten to twenty years.  For example the Highway 213, mile post 2.1 shallow-seated landslide, discussed earlier, occurred during construction of the highway in 1984 (Figure 20).  Some of the active, shallow-seated landslides occur in cutslopes and fills.

Realizing that this form of mass wasting predominates in Newell Creek Canyon, I decided to make a detailed study and map of a typical shallow-seated landslide, with a depth to failure plane of approximately 3.5 meters, (shallow-seated) located on Sha Spady’s property in the northwest section of the study area (Plate 3).  This particular detailed section of this study was performed in the spring of 1996.  In the spring of 1997, the Spady Landslide failed again, this time to a depth of approximately 5.5 to 6 meters (deep-seated).  This slide was mapped again at a scale of 1:100 following the second period of sliding (Plate 3).   The 1996 landslide on the Spady property is representative of shallow-seated landslides in the study area, and the following is a description of this landslide and its growth.

 

The Spady Landslide

The Spady property is located at the end of Alden Street in the northwest corner of the study area (Figure 21).  The property consists of a ridge trending north-northeast with slopes on either side ranging from 10°-35° (Figure 21).  The residual soils on these slopes are part of the Jory Series (45C) (Figure 4, Table 1, and Table 2) and are classified as a silty clay loam, which can contain up to 40% clay.  They are colluvial soils with a depth to the upper Troutdale Formation greater than 1.5 meters.  The vegetation on these slopes is mainly Douglas fir (up to 75 years old), maple trees, and other vegetation composed of shrubs and blackberry bushes.  At the bottom of the western slope is a creek trending northwest.  This creek begins about 140 meters south of the Spady residence as a culvert outage that funnels the runoff from the Barclay Hills apartment complex located just south of the Spady property. 

Figure 20: Oblique arial photograph of the active, shallow-seated Highway 213-mile post 2.1 landslide on the toe of the larger deep-seated slide.  This slide occurred during construction of the highway in the summer of 1984 and is indicated by arrows.  Also noted is the rock buttress located in the cutslope above the slide (after ODOT, 1998). 

Figure 21: Map of the entire Spady Landslide after the 1996 failure.  Includes the extent of the debris flow and outline of the 1997 failure (James et al., 1996).

During 1996 and 1997 this area had greater than normal precipitation, which resulted in a “100 year flood” event in February 1996 and another episode of flooding in January 1997 (Figure 22).

The 1996 Failure of the Spady Landslide

On March 6, 1996, Sha Spady, the property owner, observed three large cracks in the ground very close to where the scarp was located after the initial failure.  These cracks had an approximate one half to two meter spacing parallel to the slope and were approximately six to nine meters long with up to 30 centimeters of opening on each crack.

On March 7, Spady watched as the upper section of the slide failed with velocities ranging from 0.5 to 2 meters/second.  The slide stopped when it reached the small creek running northwest, located 100 meters west of her house, creating a small earth dam.  Over the next 4-5 days, a pond formed behind the landslide debris dam.  Finally, on March 12, Spady watched as the dam broke and a slurry of viscous soil and water flowed down the stream valley and stopped just before reaching the junction of the next creek about 120 meters down slope (Sha Spady, property owner in Newell Creek Canyon, personal communication, 1996).

Figure 22: Histogram of monthly precipitation for Oregon City from 1996 to 1997 (August) (after National Weather Service, 1998).

Description of the 1996 Failure of the Spady Landslide

Features of the landslide and debris flow were mapped by plane table mapping during April and May of 1996 at a scale of 1:150 (Figure 21 and Plate 3).  Soil samples were taken at two locations and several lab tests were performed including grain size analysis (sieve and hydrometer), Atterberg limits, dilatancy, toughness, dry strength, and unconfined compressive strength (Table 5- units 1 and 4 and appendix 3, sample locations are on Plate 3).  A Janbu stability analysis was performed to evaluate the conditions before failure as a benchmark for use elsewhere in the study area (appendix 3).

The 1996 evacuated area consists of an oblong-shaped bowl with an approximate volume of 2200 m3.  This area is located approximately 80 meters southwest of the Spady home (Figure 21).  Below the evacuated zone, filling the creek running northwest on the western side of the Spady property is the debris flow deposit.  This debris flow is 80 meters long and, on average, 10 meters wide.  This debris flow ends where the small creek enters another creek trending northeast.  The following section is a description of the four zones into which the 1996 failure of the Spady Landslide was divided for classification purposes: zone of extension, shear zones, zone of saturated flow, and the debris flow.

Table 5: Material properties for residual soils and bedrock units (beds) within the extent of the Spady Landslide.

 

 

Soil Unit 1

Bedrock Unit 1

Bedrock Unit 2

Bedrock Unit 3

Bedrock Unit 4

Sample

Sample 1 (1996)

Sample 1 (1997)

Sample 2 (1997)

Sample 3 (1997)

Sample 4 (96 &97)

Color (dry)

Brown (Tan)

Gray (Light Gray)

Red/Brown (Brown)

Gray (Light Gray)

Blue/Gray (Gray)

Relative Density

Soft-Firm

Firm

Very Firm

Firm

Stiff

Oversized % (largest)

0

0

1 (1cm)

6 (2cm)

0

Sand %

3

0

3

7

10

Silt %

91

61

50

50

54

Clay %

6

39

46

37

36

Organics

Minor Amount

Trace

None

None

None

Dry Strength

Slight to Medium

Medium

Medium

Medium

High

Dilatancy

Slow

Medium

Slow

Slow

Slow

Plasticity

BPL

BPL

BPL

BPL

NearPL

Liquid Limit %

38.6

-

-

-

45.2

Plastic Limit %

26.9

-

-

-

24.6

Unit Weight (kg/m3)

18.29

-

-

-

18.43

Unconfined Compressive Strength (kPa)

23.22

-

-

-

53.14

USCA (Unified)

Silt (ML)

Silty Clay Loam (ML-CL)

Silty Clay (CL)

Silty Clay Loam (ML)

Silty Clay Loam (ML-MH)

 

Zone of Extension - The head scarp was a concave downslope break, with a maximum vertical displacement of approximately 3.5 meters (Figure 9 and Plate 3).  This part of the landslide was approximately 21 meters wide, with no vegetation left standing.

There were a few small (1-2 cm opening) tension cracks located above the head scarp.  The interception of the flanks and the head scarp had many tension cracks extending out from the main body as far as 15 meters, characteristics of a zone of extension (Fleming and Johnson, 1989).  There was one main spring line that parallels the head scarp and was located at the base of the scarp.

Shear Zones - Both flanks were littered with tension cracks, some of which were in an en-echelon style.  These tension cracks were usually left-stepping along the right flank and right-stepping along the left flank.  They were orientated between approximately parallel along the main shear zones and closer to perpendicular where the shear zones were interrupted by a minor scarp, usually extending out from the main shear zone.  Some of the tension cracks had openings as wide as 30 centimeters.  Slickensides were located on the lower right flank where the slide entered the channel and became a debris flow.

Zone of Saturated Flow - The main body of the slide was marked by the saturated soil flows (Plate 3).  Below the head scarp, several spring lines mark the beginning of this saturated flow zone, which extended to the small creek running northwest (Plate 3).  This zone contained features that formed after the debris dam failed on March 12, as a result of smaller sloughing off the head scarp and flanks, as they were still intact after March of 1996.  These saturated flow features were generally at least twice as long as they were wide and were composed of non-blocky saturated residual soil that resemble lobes.

The point where the slide becomes a debris flow (bottom of cross section A-A’ on Plate 3 was the only place where the Upper Troutdale Formation was exposed.  The rest of the slide occurred in the residual soils that covers the parent material on the slope.

Debris Flow - The channelized section of the slide, from elevation 73 to 90 meters, was 80 meters long and has debris levees on both flanks of the main body (Figure 11).  These levees mark the highest elevation the saturated soil and debris reached during flow down the channel.  They were located along most of the debris flow and range from 0.3 to 1.2 meters in height and 3 to 28 meters in length.  The tops and sides of some of these debris levees had scour marks resembling slickensides and trended parallel to the general direction of flow.  This section of the 1996 failure of the Spady Landslide also exhibited saturated flow lobe features, like the zone of saturated flow, that contained toe-like thrusts of blocky debris at the ends of each lobe.  When this debris flow reached the intersection of the next creek, it formed a snout with a vertical thrust of about 1.5 meters.

Pre-Failure Stability Analysis - A pre-failure stability analysis was performed along the slope where the 1996 failure took place (appendix 3).  This analysis was performed using Janbu’s method of slices, which calculates the factor of safety of a known failure plane.  The cross section line A-A’ was used as the line of analysis.  The analysis variables were derived from Table 5 and a water table was assumed to be at a depth of 0.5 meters below the ground surface.  The material properties were lowered until a factor of safety at one (Fs=1.0) was reached for the higher than normal precipitation year of 1996 (Figure 22 and appendix 3).

Growth of the Spady Landslide: The 1997 Failure

The second failure occurred early in January 1997 (Figure 23), following the heavy rains of December 1996.  The first and most obvious difference was the change in shape and increase in size of the evacuated area from one to two oblong shaped bowls with a volume increase from 2,200 m3 to 14,600 m3 (Figure 21 and Figure 23).  The direction along the slope where this increase took place was not upslope, as seen in the 1996 failure, but along the slope (north, and next to the 1996 failure).  The debris flow section of this second landslide also increased to about twice the length it was after the 1996 failure and has ponded the next channel at the intersection of the two creeks (Figure 12).

Figure 23: Map of the entire extent of the 1997 Spady Landslide failure. Includes the debris flow section of the landslide and the ponded channel (Wilson et al., 1997).

Another change with the 1997 failure of this landslide is the noticeable increase in depth to the failure plane.  This increased depth, up to 2.5 meters in places, is marked by the outcrop of upper Troutdale Formation beds in the zone of stretching and the minor scarps and down-dropped blocks located below the head scarp, neither of which were seen after the 1996 failure.  The four layers outcropping within the zone of stretching are presumed to be horizontal beds of the upper Troutdale formation and vary in texture from a silty clay to a silty clay loam (Plate 3-cross section B-B’ and Table 5).

Description of the 1997 Failure of the Spady Landslide

Deformation on the surface of the 1997 failure of the Spady Landslide was documented with a Sokkia, five second Total Station, during May of 1997.  Soil samples were taken at four locations and several lab tests were performed, including grain size analysis (sieve and hydrometer), relative density, plasticity, and moisture content (Table 5-units 2, 3, and 4 appendix 3, sample locations are on Plate 3).  A post-failure (1997) stability analysis was performed to analyze the area above the new head scarp (appendix 3).  The following is a description of the four zones which the 1997 failure of the Spady Landslide was divided into for classification purposes: zone of extension, shear zones, zone of saturated flow, and the debris flow.

Zone of Extension - This section of the landslide is marked by two bowl-shaped structures, with a ridge running between them.  It is approximately 65 meters wide and 45 meters long. The head scarp has approximately five to six meters of vertical displacement (Plate 3).

There are numerous tension cracks located above the head scarp, with most of them occurring above the right bowl, where the small structure was located before it was moved in January 1997 (Figure 23).  Most of these tension cracks parallel the head scarp and range in opening from 2 to 20 centimeters.  One of these tension cracks pulled apart a surface tree root, producing 11 centimeters of displacement.  During May 1997 a quadrilateral was placed in this area of critical stability, but measurements on this quadrilateral did not display any major (>0.5 cm) movements (Keaton and DeGraff, 1996).  Above the left bowl, a tension crack with 5 to 30 centimeters of vertical and 10 to 20 centimeters of horizontal displacement marks the upper extent of the zone of extension.  This tension crack split a dead tree.

The zone of extension also has numerous minor scarps with down dropped blocks located between them.  Most of these minor scarps are located in the right bowl where the cross section is located, and none of the minor scarps appear to transect the ridge between the two bowls.  These minor scarps and down dropped blocks seem to be associated with the contacts between bedrock stratigraphy, as there is one of each with three of the four changes in stratigraphy (Plate 3-cross-section B-B’).

Shear Zone - The left flank remained almost the same as it was after the 1996 failure with the exception of some small sloughing.  The left flank is divided into two shear sections that are right stepping en-echelon.  This new shear zone (right flank) did not have many tension cracks extending out from it, like the right flank of the 1996 failure.

Zone of Saturated Flow - Like the 1996 failure, the main body of the 1997 slide has several saturated flow lobes (Plate 3).  Below the head scarp and minor scarps several spring lines mark contacts between layers and the beginning of saturated flow lobes.  These flow lobes are divided into saturated and blocky flow lobes.  The blocky lobes seem to be made of 5 to 25 centimeter in diameter blocks of bedrock, mostly from the upper two layers and the residual soils, while the saturated flow lobes are a slurry of material, non-blocky in nature.  These lobes also seem to have occurred just after the main failure as a result of head scarp, minor scarp, and flank sloughing.

Debris Flow - The channelized section of the 1997 Spady Landslide is approximately 150 meters long and like the 1996 failure, it too has debris levees on both flanks.  The current deposit (1997) flowed over the top of the 1996 deposit and into the next creek channel forming a dam at the convergence of the valleys.  A pond is currently located up valley from this dam with a water depth of approximately 0.5 to 1.5 meters.  Below this valley dam and pond the debris flow becomes thinner until it reaches the snout marked by a three meter drop off to undisturbed ground (Figure 23).

Post-Failure (1997) Analysis - Stability analysis was performed on the head scarp of the right-bowl and the area above it that contains many tension cracks.  This analysis was performed with the program XSTABL with the Bishop analysis for circular failure planes (Sharma, 1994).  The results were ten likely failure planes with factors of safety ranging from 1.1 to 1.3, values critically close to one (appendix 3).

Discussion of the Spady Landslide

The first and most obvious change in growth of this landslide is the increase in depth to the failure plane from 3.5 to 5-6 meters and the addition of a second bowl-shaped evacuation area (Plate 1 and Plate 2).

The most probable cause of initial failure of the Spady Landslide in 1996 was a combination of stream bank erosion and a higher than normal perched water table in the residual soils on the slope.  This theory is supported by the pre-failure stability analysis (appendix 3).  The raised water table is very probable, considering this failure occurred in early March 1996, right after the February 100-year flood in the Pacific Northwest (Figure 22)(National Weather Service, 1998).  This raised water table, in combination with the removal of soil (lateral support) from the stream bank through increased runoff in the creek added the increase in driving forces needed to initiate movement.

The 1996 failure occurred along the boundary between the weaker residual soils and the bedrock units of the upper Troutdale (Table 5 and Plate 1: cross-section A-A’).  These bedrock units, besides having greater strength, have a slow to no dilatancy inferring low permeability (Al-Khafaji and Andersland, 1992).  Although this unit was classified as a silt loam, it has properties very similar to a clay and is assumed to act like a clay.  This also infers that the lower units probably slowed or stopped movement of water, causing the formation of a perched water table in the residual soils.  The 1996 initial failure led to the damming of the creek, creation of a small pond, and breeching of the dam resulting in a channelized flow of soil and debris down the valley (Figure 21).

Reviewing the description and interpretation of the 1996 failure combined with the description of the 1997 failure results in some interpretation of the probable causes of the growth of the Spady Landslide in 1997.  The most probable reason for the growth of the Spady Landslide is a combination of two causes: a much increased shear stress along the head scarp and right flank of the 1996 slide combined with a higher than normal perched water table on top of the unweathered Troutdale Formation from the heavy rainfall in December 1996 and January 1997.

During the second failure it appears that the right bowl formed first through a catastrophic failure with enough force to shear some of the bedrock units, which have a greater strength than the residual soil.  After this initial failure, some smaller sloughing took place along the head scarp and left flank of the left bowl creating the saturated flow lobes.  The main excavation of the right bowl, similar to the first failure, caused a debris flow.  This debris flow traveled over the top of the 1996 deposit and created a dam at the intersection of the next creek valley.

A post-failure stability analysis reveals that the potential for growth of this landslide is highly probable (appendix 3).  In order for growth to occur, the stability analysis confirms that a higher than normal water table, similar to the surface reached during the above average precipitation years of 1996 and 1997 would be needed.  Also, the observations and mapping of the growth of this landslide tend to confirm that the head scarp (right-bowl) and upper right flank are the areas most susceptible to further growth.

Conclusions for Deep and Shallow-Seated Landslides

The main hazards associated with deep and shallow-seated landslides in the study area are very different.  The shallow-seated slides generally fail very rapidly, sometimes spawning a potentially life-threatening debris flow in the valley below.  Although these shallow-seated landslides are dangerous and can cause considerable damage when they occur, it is relatively easy and economically feasible to mitigate these landslides.  Another hazard associated with the shallow-seated slides is the potential for growth if mitigation is not implemented immediately, as shown with the Spady Landslide.

The deep-seated slides in the study area are generally not as dangerous (life-threatening), because their movements, at one time, are generally less and much slower than shallow-seated slides.  But these landslides can be extremely costly to mitigate if movement does occur, as shown with the Dewey-Warren Street landslide.  Another concern is the potential for earthquake induced movement, as studied with the Highway 213-Morton Road landslide.  If a major or great earthquake did occur, the potential for movement of these deep-seated slides greatly increases.

This concern of reactivation of deep-seated landslides is (1998) becoming a reality in some other areas, such as the Aldercrest Landslide in Kelso, Washington, and several landslides within kilometers of Newell Creek Canyon, such as the Holly Lane Landslide and the Mathew Court Landslide.  All of these active, deep-seated landslides are located in the Upper Troutdale Formation.

[Next Section] [Previous Section] [Table of Contents]